- About Israel
- News & Blog
- World Opinion
- Take Action Now
The New Yorker’s Dexter Filkins was on MSNBC last night to discuss with host Chris Hayes the latest news on the conflict between Syria and Israel. While talking about Syrian weapons transfers to Hezbollah in southern Lebanon, Mr. Filkins described them as an “armed group.”
Until 9/11, Hezbollah had killed more Americans than any other terror organization. They blew up our Embassy and Marine barracks in Lebanon in 1983, killing almost 300 Americans. They kidnapped and murdered our CIA Beirut station chief. They hijacked TWA Flight 847 in 1985 among other hijackings. They took Westerners hostage throughout the 1980s and held some for almost a decade. They blew up the AMIA Jewish cultural center in Buenos Aires in 1994. Just last year, they blew up a bus full of Israeli tourists in Bulgaria. They are a murderous terrorist organization with a global reach.
One wonders why so many Westerners find it so difficult to say so. We need to insist – in our media, in our churches, in our social circles – that we call these people what they are: terrorists. They’re not “militants.” They’re certainly not “freedom fighters” (Israel unilaterally withdrew from Lebanon in 2000; how much “freedom” does Hezbollah want?). And they’re not an “armed group.”
The issues inherent in the multiple conflicts ongoing in the Middle East are difficult enough when we do call things by their right name. Using euphemisms only muddies an already complicated picture. And it confers moral worth on a whole bunch of people who don’t deserve, it while detracting from the one moral power in the region: Israel.
Comments (25) »
Tuesday, May 7th, 2013 at 10:14 AM | Stand For Israel
It has been cleared for publication that Israeli F-16 fighter jets downed a drone off of Haifa’s coastline at around noon Thursday.
The unmanned aircraft apparently entered Israel’s airspace from the north and was heading south. Explosions were heard in the area.
Israel Navy vessels were searching for the wreckage. The drone was apparently sent by Hezbollah in Lebanon. The warplanes were scrambled from the Ramat David airbase. Reports of Israeli flyovers in Lebanon followed the drone’s interception.
Comments (20) »
Thursday, April 25th, 2013 at 9:38 AM | Stand For Israel
Michael J. Totten, one of the most astute and well-informed observers of the situation in Lebanon, writes about the escalating sectarian violence in the northern Lebanese city of Tripoli and the impact may have on the country as a whole – a country with a long history of being torn apart along sectarian fault lines.
It sounds ridiculous, but it’s true. Factions within the Lebanese army really are protecting both the Sunni and Alawite militias. Partly this is because the army is just as divided along sectarian lines as the country is, but mostly it’s because many of the army officers are still loyal to Assad and to Hezbollah. That still hasn’t changed since Syria’s occupation of Lebanon when the Assad family and their henchmen sabotaged the Lebanese army and bent it to their will.
Thursday, March 28th, 2013 at 9:22 AM | Stand For Israel
There’s a lot not to like about this article in The New Yorker by Dexter Filkins – for example, the author seems to think that Lebanon is an “established democracy” – but it’s a fascinating, if a little too New Yorker-ish, look at what’s happening in Lebanon and why we should all be paying more attention.
Comments (6) »
If Lebanon’s President, Michel Suleiman, accepts Mikati’s resignation, as he seems likely to do, the country could be entering a protracted political crisis, without a functional government. That kind of power vacuum, in a country as fragile as Lebanon, could lead to sectarian violence. Mikati himself, in his televised statement on Friday, seemed to hint at just such a possibility. “The region is heading toward the unknown,’’ he said.
Wednesday, March 27th, 2013 at 9:24 AM | Stand For Israel
Matthew Levitt and Magnus Norell of the Washington Institute on Near East Policy write that the attack on a group of Jewish tourists in Bulgaria last year has Hezbollah on the verge of being added to the European Union’s terrorist list – a long overdue step that will deprive them of significant funding and will probably expose Europe to greater Hezbollah attack.
Comments (11) »
In a speech timed to mark the anniversaries of famous slain Hezbollah militants, Nasrallah’s only comment on the Burgas investigation was a passing non-comment: “I don’t want to comment on the Bulgarian accusation. This issue is being looked at in a patient and calm manner and we will see later how to deal with it depending on the outcome.” His only substantive comment was to warn of Hezbollah’s capabilities to strike at Israel should Jerusalem choose to attack Hezbollah in Lebanon in retaliation.
Thursday, February 28th, 2013 at 8:34 AM | Stand For Israel
Shlomi Eldar, writing in al-Monitor, points out that since Israel assassinated his predecessor, Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah’s favorite pastime – and, seemingly, the only thing he leaves the safety of his underground lair for – is to issue threats against the Jewish state. He did it again last week. Check out Eldar’s take on what the arch-terrorist had to say.
There’s no need for any in-depth analysis to realize that Hassan Nasrallah’s bluster and threats are inversely proportional to his dwindling strength and the troubling situation in which he finds himself. It is a classic example of lashing out defensively out of fear for his future.
Comments (16) »
Friday, February 22nd, 2013 at 8:32 AM | Stand For Israel
The Council on Foreign Relations blog runs an interview with Matthew Levitt of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Levitt says that Iran and its terrorist proxy, Hezbollah, are laying the groundwork to capitalize on the end of the Assad regime – even while doing their best to help Assad kill his way to stability:
Comments (8) »
People tend to misunderstand the relationship between Hezbollah and Iran, which has changed over time but is now extremely close. The U.S. intelligence community has publicly described this as a “strategic partnership.” But people don’t fully appreciate Hezbollah’s ideological commitment to the concept of “velayat-e faqih,” or guardianship of the jurists, which holds that a Shiite Islamic cleric should also serve as supreme head of government. For Hezbollah, this means the Iranian leadership is also their leader — not for every foot soldier, but for Hezbollah’s senior leaders absolutely.
Tuesday, February 19th, 2013 at 9:15 AM | Stand For Israel
Yesterday, we posted a Lee Smith piece on the assassination of a Lebanese general. Today, Aymenn Jawad al-Tamimi explores whether that assassination might lead Lebanon to civil war – further destabilizing Israel’s northern neighbor and, possibly, bringing Hezbollah to even greater power.
Comments (4) »
Undoubtedly, the weakening or fall of the Assad regime translates to a weakening of Hezbollah’s position in Lebanon, and it is notable how muted the group’s response has been to the al-Hassan affair, which indicates that the organization certainly does feel under pressure over the growing perception of its role as a pro-Assad partisan force in Syria.
Wednesday, October 31st, 2012 at 8:37 AM | Stand For Israel
Hard to believe we missed this Lee Smith piece from a few days ago. Smith, one of the sharpest observers of Middle East affairs, writes about the murder of General Wissam al-Hassan and the larger stakes for the futures of Lebanon and Syria. A great read.
Comments (7) »
The current campaign may turn out to be even bloodier for the stakes are higher—to ensure not only the continuation of Hezbollah’s hegemony, but also the Syrian regime’s survival. Assad is counting on the international community, led by the White House, to rescue him from the twenty-month long uprising that seeks to bring his regime down on his head.
Tuesday, October 30th, 2012 at 9:14 AM | Stand For Israel